Lesser known reasons to keep blocks small, in the words of Bitcoin Core developers

If we could somehow increase the block size to a level that would keep transaction capacity above demand for two years, in a way that was safe for decentralization during this period, would you be in favor of doing so?

  1. If we increase the block size, we create an implicit promise that we will keep increasing it indefinitely. Even if increasing the block size is safe now, this won’t always be true. It’s best to hold firm on keeping blocks small to prevent users from expecting further increases.
  2. We will need fees to pay for security at some point in the future, so it’s important to create a fee market soon.
  3. Keeping transaction capacity ahead of demand removes the incentive to build, deploy, and maintain more long term scaling solutions such as the Lightning Network, so we should let blocks fill up now.

Quotes from Core Developers

Open debate would help

--

--

--

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

About the Economy

Class and automation

Private Debt Collection Program

The world is in Thucydides Trap

JPMorgan Chase reportedly agrees to $55 million settlement for discriminatory lending

The Great Grift

Millennials: Redefining the Rules of the Economy

When Will Home Prices Drop In Southern California?

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Elliot Olds

Elliot Olds

More from Medium

Different ways you can develop your cryptocurrency exchange software

Buy the China crash?

Blockchain Revolution And How It Will Change Or Destroy The World

Pride is the devil